Tami Keim's Personal Teaching Philosophy
After teaching for a
number of years I still can say that I thoroughly enjoy teaching.
Why? I find it extremely rewarding to be a part of the personal
and professional development of my students. My greatest rewards
come as I see growth in students as they: explore new concepts;
ask questions and pursue answers; make connections between concepts
and practices; get excited about what they are learning; express
confidence in their knowledge base for developing their own teaching
practices; and find direction for their future.
Goals for student outcomes provide a framework for my teaching
practices. I hope that students will be able to develop skills
in teaching and working with children. Equally important to me
is that they develop a thorough understanding of why they do what
they do, a theoretical and philosophical base for their practices.
Therefore, I consistently intertwine "why" with "how
to" in the early childhood education program. It is a joy
to see students develop my ideal student outcomes that include
the following abilities and dispositions:
- Gain a knowledge base upon which to build teaching practices: theories,
research findings, fundamentals of learning/teaching, child development,
and current concepts of "best practices" in early education
- Be an effective teacher in guiding the learning of young children
- Demonstrate respect and appreciation for all people
- Relate effectively with children as well as adults, especially
parents and coworkers
- Be a self-motivated life-long learner who will continue growing
in knowledge, attitude, and performance
- Practice critical thinking and problem-solving in their every day
lives.
I am an eclectic who draws from multiple sources in creating my
own personal approach to teaching. Theoretical and philosophical
concepts create a foundation for my teaching just as I desire they
will for my students. Following are some of the approaches coupled
with implications for my instruction:
- Constructivist Theory (Piaget and Bruner). I believe that learning
is an active process in which learners construct new ideas or concepts
based on their current or past knowledge.
- I encourage students to discover principles through their own active
involvement with the content. I seek to create a student-centered
classroom where students participate in dialogue, discover and
integrate new knowledge, make curriculum choices, and feel safe
to explore ideas.
- Experiential Learning (C. Rogers). I believe students learn best
when the learning is experienced or significant because it addresses
their needs and wants. Humans have a natural propensity to learn.
Their learning is enhanced when the subject matter is relevant
to their personal interests and the learning is self-initiated.
- I attempt to function as a facilitator of learning; as one who
clarifies the purposes for the learner and then organizes and makes
learning resources available, guiding their activities. I give
students some control over the nature and direction of the learning
and help them to self-initiate their own learning. I base learning
on problems and situations that confront students. I help them
self-evaluate their progress and success.
- Social Learning Theory (Vygotsky). I believe that people learn
in a social context. They learn through interaction with others
and within the expectations and guidelines of their environment.
The greatest learning takes place in the Zone of Proximal Development,
which is the area of difficulty just between what they can accomplish
on their own and what they can accomplish with support.
- I challenge students and provide the necessary support to enable
them to function at the peak of their abilities. I build on what
they already know and are able to do.
- Multiple Intelligences (Gardner). I believe that individuals possess
varying degrees of each of the multiple intelligences. They demonstrate
strength in both different content domains and in learning modalities
of the intelligences.
- I encourage students to use and build on the strengths of their
preferred intelligences. I try to integrate several different methods
in my classroom that accommodate my students’ various strengths.
For example, I might integrate a mini-lecture, class discussion,
small group work, role play, and/or a hands-on project in the same
class lesson. Assessment is also based on multiple sources and
types of activities.
- Subsumption Theory (Ausubel). I believe that individuals are able
to learn large amounts of meaningful material from verbal and textual
presentations (expository learning) when the new material is related
to relevant ideas that they already possess.
- I present new concepts in a general manner first in ways that help
learners integrate it with their previous information. Then we
progressively differentiate in terms of detail and specificity.
I also attempt to help them develop their teaching skills in general
first, followed by more specific refined expectations.
- Androgy (Knowles). I believe adults become self-directed learners
who expect to take responsibility for their own decisions. They
need to know why they should learn something to become motivated
to learn. They need to learn experientially. They are most interested
in learning that has immediate relevance to their own lives.
- I place a lot of emphasis on the process of learning, using strategies
that involve the student. I see myself as a resource and facilitator,
rather than only as a lecturer and grader. My instruction is task-oriented
with learning activities which are in the context of tasks to be
performed. I involve students in the planning and evaluation of
their learning. I use evaluation for both formative and summative
purposes.
I am humbled when I review these lofty concepts and goals. I accept
the challenge to continuously evolve as both a teacher and a learner.
I will continue refining my philosophy and practices as I attempt
to more effectively guide my students’ learning and development.